🎇 Mig 29 Vs Su 33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The Soviet post-PFI projects are several Soviet and Russian Air Force projects initiated to replace the PFI-era aircraft. The result of the LPFI project was the Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum. The result of the TPFI project was the Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker. During the mid-1970s, the Soviets initiated the I-90 fighter The bubble canopy pops out more than that of the Fulcrum. The Su-27 family has space in between the intakes, but unlike the MiG-29 the nose gear retracts forward. The space between the air channels and engines remains until the end of the fuselage. The end of the fuselage extends beyond the exhausts, creating a so-called stinger tail, typical The Su-27 family has seen much less action. Su-27s flown by the Ethiopian Air Force that saw combat in the 1998-2000 war with Eritrea scored at least two and as many as 10 air-to-air kills. The Flanker has also seen action over Syria, Chechnya, and Georgia, scoring one confirmed kill over Chechnya in 1994. Advantage: F-15 Eagle. 2. Avionics May 27, 2023 Mig-29 vs Su-27: A Comparative Analysis of Two Iconic Fighter Jets Article by: Defensebridge Regarding high-performance fighter jets, few aircraft can match the capabilities and legacy of the Mig-29 and Su-27. These Russian-made warplanes have gained worldwide recognition for their exceptional maneuverability, speed, and versatility. While Frontal Aviation MiG-29 and Su-27S fighters were to win the air battle, allowing the less agile Su-24, Su-17, MiG-23BM and MiG-27 to survive and attack their targets, it was evident to Soviet planners that replacements for these strike aircraft would need to be capable of surviving close contact with the F-16 and especially the F-15. The Russians have been flying derated 33 klb Al-41Fs in a Su-27S since 2004. With Al-41F engines installed the Flanker's robust margin in kinematic performance against the Super Hornet grows considerably in all regimes of flight – it provides the Flanker with 'F-22-like' raw agility and performance. The J-15 “Flying Shark” is derived from the Su-33, a navalized variant of the Su-27 for carrier operations with folding wings, strengthened landing gear and an arresting hook. Su-27, Su-33, MiG-29. R-27 are Russian mid-range missiles, there are 4 types in DCS. Now we will talk only about 2 of these types, to see rest of types check next section. 1. R-27T. R-27T is a mid range missile that can be used with all locking modes in the last section. 2. Mainly because you actually get 2 jets I believe. All owners of the Su-27 get the J-11 as well. The J-11 is the Chinese 'Su-27', but it also gets active radar R-77 missiles, which aren't great, but are definitely nice to have. If you want mission variety, then the Su-33 would allow you to do Russian carrier ops, extend your missions with AAR, etc. R-77 is active radar missile. R-27R's or ER's are SARH missile. the rest are infared. R-77 range is 40-50km effective although its possible perhaps to hit something at greater distance. R-27 range is 70km effective, generally has more legs then the R-77 and amraam but not by much. In terms of turn rate and turn radius, the F-16 is closest to the MiG-29, and can do a respectable 25º AoA, although the pilot cannot override that limit as in the MiG-29 and Su-27. To an F-16 pilot, a MiG-29 is like an F/A-18 with its low speed nose pointing ability combined with high thrust/acceleration of the F-16. F/A-18 Hornet The Su-9 is capable of destroying ground targets with its suspended armament. When dive bombing, don't pull of to late as the engines aren't that powerful. It is possible to destroy some light and medium tanks with the right ammunition belt. For destroying tanks, top-down approaches are heavily recommended. 2VJ60.

mig 29 vs su 33